Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Lonnie Saunders
This text of 979 F.2d 847 (Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Lonnie Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frank Ervin ALTIZER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lonnie SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-6972.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 26, 1992
Decided: November 17, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
William Rundahl Coleman, Office of the Attorney General of VIrginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Altizer v. Saunders, No. CA-91-808-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
979 F.2d 847, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35176, 1992 WL 337042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-ervin-altizer-jr-v-lonnie-saunders-ca4-1992.