Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Lonnie M. Saunders Larry W. Huffman Swisher Santiago Captain Hardin Unknown

72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39538, 1995 WL 747088
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 15, 1995
Docket95-7445
StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 126 (Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Lonnie M. Saunders Larry W. Huffman Swisher Santiago Captain Hardin Unknown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. Lonnie M. Saunders Larry W. Huffman Swisher Santiago Captain Hardin Unknown, 72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39538, 1995 WL 747088 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Frank Ervin ALTIZER, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Lonnie M. SAUNDERS; Larry W. Huffman; Swisher; Santiago;
Captain Hardin; Unknown Defendants, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7445.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 21, 1995.
Decided Dec. 15, 1995.

Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-413-R)

Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Altizer v. Saunders, No. CA-92-413-R (W.D.Va. July 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39538, 1995 WL 747088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-ervin-altizer-jr-v-lonnie-m-saunders-larry-w-ca4-1995.