Frank E. v. New York State Division of Human Rights
110 A.D.2d 897, 489 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48801
Opinion
The division’s finding of no probable cause “cannot be considered to have been devoid of a rational basis, the touchstone of arbitrary and capricious agency action” (State Off. of Drug Abuse Servs. v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 48 NY2d 276, 284). Thus, the determination is upheld.
We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be lacking in merit. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frank E. v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 110 A.D.2d 897, 489 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 897 (Frank E. v. New York State Division of Human Rights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Office of Drug Abuse Services v. State Human Rights Appeal Board
397 N.E.2d 1314 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)