Frank E. v. New York State Division of Human Rights

110 A.D.2d 897, 489 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48801

This text of 110 A.D.2d 897 (Frank E. v. New York State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank E. v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 110 A.D.2d 897, 489 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

The division’s finding of no probable cause “cannot be considered to have been devoid of a rational basis, the touchstone of arbitrary and capricious agency action” (State Off. of Drug Abuse Servs. v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 48 NY2d 276, 284). Thus, the determination is upheld.

We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be lacking in merit. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Office of Drug Abuse Services v. State Human Rights Appeal Board
397 N.E.2d 1314 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.2d 897, 489 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-e-v-new-york-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-1985.