Frank DePinto v. Corporal Hoffman, 114
This text of Frank DePinto v. Corporal Hoffman, 114 (Frank DePinto v. Corporal Hoffman, 114) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-4624 _____________________________
FRANK DEPINTO,
Appellant,
v.
CORPORAL HOFFMAN, #114,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. James B. Fensom, Judge.
August 9, 2019
PER CURIAM.
Frank DePinto appeals an order declaring him to be a vexatious litigant and imposing sanctions. A vexatious litigant is a person who, during a five-year period, “has commenced, prosecuted, or maintained, pro se, five or more civil actions in any court in this state, except an action governed by the Florida Small Claims Rules, which actions have been finally and adversely determined against such person.” § 68.093(d)1., Fla. Stat. (2018). DePinto filed nine pro se civil complaints within a two-year period; all were dismissed with prejudice. In determining that DePinto is a vexatious litigant, the trial court did not err.
AFFIRMED. B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Frank DePinto, pro se, Appellant.
Gwendolyn P. Adkins of Coppins Monroe, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frank DePinto v. Corporal Hoffman, 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-depinto-v-corporal-hoffman-114-fladistctapp-2019.