Frank D. Yturria v. Banales, Hon. J. Manuel, Hon. William H. Keys, Hon. Ron Young and Hon. William Dodge

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 23, 2009
Docket13-94-00346-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Frank D. Yturria v. Banales, Hon. J. Manuel, Hon. William H. Keys, Hon. Ron Young and Hon. William Dodge (Frank D. Yturria v. Banales, Hon. J. Manuel, Hon. William H. Keys, Hon. Ron Young and Hon. William Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank D. Yturria v. Banales, Hon. J. Manuel, Hon. William H. Keys, Hon. Ron Young and Hon. William Dodge, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-94-00346-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________

FRANK D. YTURRIA, Relator,

v.

HON. J. MANUEL BAÑALES, ET AL., Respondents. _____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This petition for writ of mandamus was abated by this Court on June 2, 1994, due

to the mandamus action being premature. The original proceeding was abated until such

time as the superseded partition judgment was finally determined through the normal

course of appeal. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this original

proceeding. On March 12, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the

status of the original proceeding and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the original

proceeding or a motion to dismiss the original proceeding. The trial court responded to the

order by informing this Court that the case was settled on all issues and recommended that

the pending petition for writ of mandamus be dismissed. Accordingly, we reinstate and

dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP. P.

42.3(b). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 23rd day of April, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Frank D. Yturria v. Banales, Hon. J. Manuel, Hon. William H. Keys, Hon. Ron Young and Hon. William Dodge, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-d-yturria-v-banales-hon-j-manuel-hon-william-texapp-2009.