Frank Carbonaro v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Frank Carbonaro v. United States

461 F.2d 1108, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8945

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 16, 1972

Docket72-1179

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 461 F.2d 1108 (Frank Carbonaro v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank Carbonaro v. United States, 461 F.2d 1108, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8945 (8th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the second attempt 1 of the appellant, Frank Carbonaro, to vacate and set aside the sentence imposed upon him following his plea of guilty to violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 495 (forgery of United States savings bond) and a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 371 (conspiracy). He now appeals from the lower court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion which was based upon his contention that the pre-sentence report which stated that he “comes from a notorious family of hoodlums” was highly prejudicial and unwarranted and that the report failed to include several letters that he had sub *1109 mitted to the probation officer containing information favorable to him.

The lower court, after disposing of appellant’s contention, went on to say:

“The Court is satisfied that no fact material to this petition is in dispute even reading the petition as favorable to petitioner’s cause as possible, the contentions border on the frivolous.”

From our own examination of the record, we are satisfied that this assessment of appellant’s contentions is correct. The order of the district court is affirmed.

1

. Carbonaro v. United States, 428 F.2d 795 (8 Cir. 1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is the second attempt 1 of the appellant, Frank Carbonaro, to vacate and set aside the sentence imposed upon him following his plea of guilty to violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 495 (forgery of United States savings bond) and a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 371 (conspiracy). He now appeals from the lower court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion which was based upon his contention that the pre-sentence report which stated that he “comes from a notorious family of hoodlums” was highly prejudicial and unwarranted and that the report failed to include several letters that he had sub *1109 mitted to the probation officer containing information favorable to him.

The lower court, after disposing of appellant’s contention, went on to say:

“The Court is satisfied that no fact material to this petition is in dispute even reading the petition as favorable to petitioner’s cause as possible, the contentions border on the frivolous.”

From our own examination of the record, we are satisfied that this assessment of appellant’s contentions is correct. The order of the district court is affirmed.

1

. Carbonaro v. United States, 428 F.2d 795 (8 Cir. 1970).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

461 F.2d 1108, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-carbonaro-v-united-states-ca8-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack