Frank C. Williams v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent

819 F.2d 107
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 15, 1987·No. 86-3782·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Williams, a state prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his petition for § 2254 relief, asserting ineffective assistance of counsel in his original criminal proceeding. He raised this issue unsuccessfully in a prior petition, however; and his present petition is barred under Rule 9(b), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. Today, he simply seeks to advance the same claim, supported by new arguments thought up since the last time that he advanced it. Rule 9(b) is not so easily evaded. Johnson v. McCotter, 803 F.2d 830 (5th Cir.1986). 1

AFFIRMED.

1

. The trial court acted on another ground in dismissing Williams’ petition, however we can properly affirm its correct decision on any ground urged to it. Cross v. Lucius, 713 F.2d 153 (5th Cir.1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank C. Williams v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent, 819 F.2d 107 (5th Cir. 1987).

819 F.2d 107 (Frank C. Williams v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related