Frank C. Scheer, D/b/a/ All States Coach Service v. Holy Cross Hospital, Incorporated, A/K/A Holy Cross Hospital

23 F.3d 403, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18553, 1994 WL 168270
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 1994
Docket93-2562
StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.3d 403 (Frank C. Scheer, D/b/a/ All States Coach Service v. Holy Cross Hospital, Incorporated, A/K/A Holy Cross Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank C. Scheer, D/b/a/ All States Coach Service v. Holy Cross Hospital, Incorporated, A/K/A Holy Cross Hospital, 23 F.3d 403, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18553, 1994 WL 168270 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

23 F.3d 403
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Frank C. SCHEER, d/b/a/ All States Coach Service, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Holy Cross
Hospital, Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-2562.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 5, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-1307-6-3AK)

Frank C. Scheer, appellant pro se.

Susan Macon Seigle, Foley & Lardner, West Palm Beach, FL, for appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his suit without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction over the Defendant. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scheer v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc., No. CA-93-1307-6-3AK (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F.3d 403, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18553, 1994 WL 168270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-c-scheer-dba-all-states-coach-service-v-holy-ca4-1994.