Frank C. Pabst and Helen R. Pabst v. John P. Dant Distillery Company

Sixth Circuit

Frank C. Pabst and Helen R. Pabst v. John P. Dant Distillery Company

199 F.2d 372

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 22, 1952

Docket11517

StatusPublished

This text of 199 F.2d 372 (Frank C. Pabst and Helen R. Pabst v. John P. Dant Distillery Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank C. Pabst and Helen R. Pabst v. John P. Dant Distillery Company, 199 F.2d 372 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the defendants from a judgment entered in the District Court in an action for a declaration of rights involving charges by a warehouseman for labor and services in connection with the withdrawal and delivery of more than five thousand barrels of whiskey has been heard and considered on the record and oh the oral arguments and, briefs of the attorneys;

. And it -appearing that the findings of fact of the District Court are supported by substantial evidence and are mot clearly erroneous and its conclusions of law are correct; ‘

The judgment of the District Court in •favor of the appellee warehouseman is affirmed. - ■ .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the defendants from a judgment entered in the District Court in an action for a declaration of rights involving charges by a warehouseman for labor and services in connection with the withdrawal and delivery of more than five thousand barrels of whiskey has been heard and considered on the record and oh the oral arguments and, briefs of the attorneys;

. And it -appearing that the findings of fact of the District Court are supported by substantial evidence and are mot clearly erroneous and its conclusions of law are correct; ‘

The judgment of the District Court in •favor of the appellee warehouseman is affirmed. - ■ .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 F.2d 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-c-pabst-and-helen-r-pabst-v-john-p-dant-distillery-company-ca6-1952.