FRANK, BRENDA v. THE ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL
This text of FRANK, BRENDA v. THE ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL (FRANK, BRENDA v. THE ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1316 CA 12-00950 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
BRENDA FRANK, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF ALAINA FRANK, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
THE ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, DOING BUSINESS AS ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
HOGAN WILLIG, AMHERST (JENNIFER L. FAY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.
BROWN & TARANTINO, LLC, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY S. ALBANESE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered September 9, 2011. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to strike the answer of defendant The Rochester General Hospital, doing business as Rochester General Hospital, and ordered that an adverse inference charge shall be given at trial.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Coleman v Putnam Hosp. Ctr., 74 AD3d 1009, lv dismissed 15 NY3d 857, 16 NY3d 884).
Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
FRANK, BRENDA v. THE ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-brenda-v-the-rochester-general-hospital-nyappdiv-2012.