Frank Berman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Frank Berman v. State

DecidedAugust 25, 2016

DocketA16A1119

StatusPublished

This text of Frank Berman v. State (Frank Berman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank Berman v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 15, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1119. FRANK BERMAN v. THE STATE.

In 2005, Frank Berman was convicted of two counts of child molestation and one count of aggravated child molestation. Berman’s convictions were affirmed on appeal. See Berman v. State, Case No. A13A1437 (decided October 31, 2013). In December 2015, Berman filed an extraordinary motion for new trial.1 The trial court denied the motion, and Berman filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7), appeals from the denial of an extraordinary motion for new trial must comply with the discretionary appeal procedure. See Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Berman’s failure to comply with the necessary procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over his appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

1 Berman had previously filed a motion to set aside a void judgment, which was denied by the trial court. Berman sought direct appeal of the trial court’s order and this Court dismissed his appeal. See Case No. A14A0913 (decided February 4, 2014). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/15/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 15, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1119. FRANK BERMAN v. THE STATE.

In 2005, Frank Berman was convicted of two counts of child molestation and one count of aggravated child molestation. Berman’s convictions were affirmed on appeal. See Berman v. State, Case No. A13A1437 (decided October 31, 2013). In December 2015, Berman filed an extraordinary motion for new trial.1 The trial court denied the motion, and Berman filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7), appeals from the denial of an extraordinary motion for new trial must comply with the discretionary appeal procedure. See Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Berman’s failure to comply with the necessary procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over his appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

1 Berman had previously filed a motion to set aside a void judgment, which was denied by the trial court. Berman sought direct appeal of the trial court’s order and this Court dismissed his appeal. See Case No. A14A0913 (decided February 4, 2014). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/15/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Frank Berman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-berman-v-state-gactapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack