Frank B. Lucero v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary
This text of 456 F.2d 686 (Frank B. Lucero v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon initial screening this case was assigned to the summary calendar and notice was sent to the appellant. In addition, the appellee thereafter filed a motion to affirm which has been opposed by Lucero’s attorney in a memorandum addressing the underlying merits. Nevertheless, we have now carefully and thoroughly reviewed the files and records in this case and are convinced that the judgment of the district court is correct.
Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court, reported at 335 F.Supp. 93 (D.C. Colo.1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
456 F.2d 686, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-b-lucero-v-wayne-k-patterson-warden-colorado-state-penitentiary-ca10-1972.