Frank B. Lucero v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary

Tenth Circuit

Frank B. Lucero v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary

456 F.2d 686, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10233

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided April 7, 1972·No. 72-1133·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM,'

Upon initial screening this case was assigned to the summary calendar and notice was sent to the appellant. In addition, the appellee thereafter filed a motion to affirm which has been opposed by Lucero’s attorney in a memorandum addressing the underlying merits. Nevertheless, we have now carefully and thoroughly reviewed the files and records in this case and are convinced that the judgment of the district court is correct.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court, reported at 335 F.Supp. 93 (D.C. Colo.1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM,'

Upon initial screening this case was assigned to the summary calendar and notice was sent to the appellant. In addition, the appellee thereafter filed a motion to affirm which has been opposed by Lucero’s attorney in a memorandum addressing the underlying merits. Nevertheless, we have now carefully and thoroughly reviewed the files and records in this case and are convinced that the judgment of the district court is correct.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court, reported at 335 F.Supp. 93 (D.C. Colo.1971).

Frank B. Lucero v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, 456 F.2d 686, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10233 (10th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

456 F.2d 686 (Frank B. Lucero v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related