Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Orient Overseas Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Orient Overseas Associates

68 A.D.2d 861, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11076

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A.D.2d 861 (Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Orient Overseas Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Orient Overseas Associates, 68 A.D.2d 861, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11076 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for resettlement granted insofar as to permit defendant to recover costs and disbursements at the trial level in accordance with the stipulation of the parties and, on resettlement, to additionally modify the judgment appealed from by vacating so much thereof as awarded costs to plaintiff and by awarding costs to defendant and, as so modified, to otherwise affirm the judgment. The parties are directed to resettle the order, including a provision to recall the opinion and to republish it with a changed dispositive paragraph reflecting the stipulated modification regarding costs and disbursements in the action. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Fein, Sandler, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for resettlement granted insofar as to permit defendant to recover costs and disbursements at the trial level in accordance with the stipulation of the parties and, on resettlement, to additionally modify the judgment appealed from by vacating so much thereof as awarded costs to plaintiff and by awarding costs to defendant and, as so modified, to otherwise affirm the judgment. The parties are directed to resettle the order, including a provision to recall the opinion and to republish it with a changed dispositive paragraph reflecting the stipulated modification regarding costs and disbursements in the action. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Fein, Sandler, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.2d 861, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-b-hall-co-v-orient-overseas-associates-nyappdiv-1979.