Frank Atwood v. David Shinn

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frank Atwood v. David Shinn. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 F.4th 834
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2022·No. 22-15821·Published

Opinion

FILED FOR PUBLICATION JUN 7 2022 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANK JARVIS ATWOOD, No. 22-15821

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:22-cv-00860-MTL-JZB District of Arizona, DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Phoenix Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry; et al., ORDER Defendants-Appellees.

Before: S. R. THOMAS, Circuit Judge and Capital Case Coordinator

The three-judge panel has issued an opinion affirming the judgment of the

district court and denying the request for a stay of execution. The Appellant

subsequently filed a Petition for Rehearing En Banc. Pursuant to the rules

applicable to capital cases when an execution date has been scheduled, a deadline

was established for any judge to request a vote on whether the panel opinion

should be reheard en banc. No judge requested a vote within the established time

period. Therefore, en banc proceedings with respect to the panel opinion are

concluded. The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied. The panel opinion

affirming the district court is the final order of this Court pertaining to this appeal.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank Atwood v. David Shinn, (9th Cir. 2022).

Frank Atwood v. David Shinn (Frank Atwood v. David Shinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.