Frank Alton Martinez v. the State of Texas
This text of Frank Alton Martinez v. the State of Texas (Frank Alton Martinez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00502-CR
Frank Alton Martinez, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. A-22-0858-SA, THE HONORABLE CARMEN DUSEK, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Frank Alton Martinez has appealed his conviction for the offense of
assault of a family member. Martinez’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to
withdraw, abate this appeal, and stay the filing of appellant’s brief until such time as new
appellate counsel has been appointed. In her motion, counsel advises this Court that she can no
longer represent Martinez because she has recently been offered and accepted a staff attorney
position with the Thirteenth Court of Appeals.
The trial court has the responsibility for appointing counsel to represent indigent
defendants on appeal as well as the authority to relieve or replace appointed counsel upon a
finding of good cause. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). Thus, when
counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant on appeal, it is the trial
court’s responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); Williamson v. State, No. 13–12–00672–CR, 2013 WL
363677, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 25, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated
for publication).
We therefore dismiss counsel’s motion to withdraw, abate the appeal, and remand
the cause to the district court. Upon remand, counsel is instructed to re-file her motion to
withdraw with the district court. If the district court determines that good cause exists to relieve
counsel of her duties and replace her with substitute counsel, the district court shall permit
counsel to withdraw and promptly appoint substitute counsel for the appeal of this cause. A
copy of the court’s order appointing substitute counsel and the court’s order granting counsel’s
withdrawal shall be forwarded to this Court no later than March 3, 2025. Substitute counsel shall
file appellant’s brief within thirty days of appointment.1
Before Justices Triana, Theofanis, and Crump
Abated and Remanded
Filed: February 20, 2025
Do Not Publish
1 Counsel has also filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. We dismiss that motion as moot. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frank Alton Martinez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-alton-martinez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.