Frank Adams & Co. v. United States

375 U.S. 215
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 17, 1964
Docket506
StatusPublished

This text of 375 U.S. 215 (Frank Adams & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank Adams & Co. v. United States, 375 U.S. 215 (1964).

Opinion

375 U.S. 215

84 S.Ct. 341

11 L.Ed.2d 269

FRANK ADAMS & CO. et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.

No. 506.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 9, 1963

Rehearing Denied Feb. 17, 1964.

See 376 U.S. 929, 84 S.Ct. 657.

Howard Gould, for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson, for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.

F. B. Henderson, Richard J. Murphy, Kemper A. Dobbins, R. B. Claytor and Robert H. Bierma, for appellee rail carriers.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Henry B. Street for leave to withdraw his appearance as counsel for the appellants is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kaye v. Spence Chapin Adoption Home
375 U.S. 214 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Frank Adams & Co. v. United States
375 U.S. 215 (Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
375 U.S. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-adams-co-v-united-states-scotus-1964.