Frank Abel v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, John G. Grimes v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary
This text of 314 F.2d 342 (Frank Abel v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, John G. Grimes v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
314 F.2d 342
Frank ABEL, Appellant,
v.
Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, Appellee.
John G. GRIMES, Appellant,
v.
Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, Appellee.
Nos. 7171, 7172.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Feb. 27, 1963, Rehearing Denied May 1, 1963.
Walter L. Gerash, Denver, Colo., for appellants.
J. F. Brauer, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., were with him on the brief), for appellee.
Before BREITENSTEIN, HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
A careful consideration of the entire record before us, including the transcript of the trial proceedings had in the District Court of Gunnison County, Colorado, shows that the findings of fact made by the court below are amply supported by the evidence.
The denial of the writ of habeas corpus by the lower court is affirmed in accordance with the views expressed in that court's exhaustive Memorandum Opinion, reported in D.C., 213 F.Supp. 784, without written opinion here.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
314 F.2d 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-abel-v-harry-c-tinsley-warden-colorado-state-ca10-1963.