Frank Abel v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, John G. Grimes v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary

314 F.2d 342
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided May 1, 1963·No. 7172_1·Published

Opinion

314 F.2d 342

Frank ABEL, Appellant,
v.
Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, Appellee.
John G. GRIMES, Appellant,
v.
Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, Appellee.

Nos. 7171, 7172.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 27, 1963, Rehearing Denied May 1, 1963.

Walter L. Gerash, Denver, Colo., for appellants.

J. F. Brauer, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., and Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., were with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before BREITENSTEIN, HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the entire record before us, including the transcript of the trial proceedings had in the District Court of Gunnison County, Colorado, shows that the findings of fact made by the court below are amply supported by the evidence.

The denial of the writ of habeas corpus by the lower court is affirmed in accordance with the views expressed in that court's exhaustive Memorandum Opinion, reported in D.C., 213 F.Supp. 784, without written opinion here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank Abel v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, John G. Grimes v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, 314 F.2d 342 (10th Cir. 1963).

314 F.2d 342 (Frank Abel v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, John G. Grimes v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abel v. Tinsley
213 F. Supp. 784 (D. Colorado, 1962)