Frangesh v. Schwartz
This text of 548 So. 2d 299 (Frangesh v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellants moved to intervene in appel-lees’ dissolution proceeding to establish a lien against the marital home. Fields v. Fields, 35 So.2d 722 (Fla.1948) and Picchi v. Picchi, 100 So.2d 627 (Fla.1958), cited by appellants, do not support the argument that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied their motion to intervene. In Fields, the wife moved to bring in aft additional party in an effort to clear title to a parcel of marital property. In Picchi, the wife sought to join two corporations she claimed were the husband’s alter-ego. Here, neither party sought joinder of appellants. Based on the record before us, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellants' motion to intervene. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
548 So. 2d 299, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2085, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4901, 1989 WL 101272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frangesh-v-schwartz-fladistctapp-1989.