Frangesh v. Schwartz

548 So. 2d 299, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2085, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4901, 1989 WL 101272
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 6, 1989
DocketNo. 89-0292
StatusPublished

This text of 548 So. 2d 299 (Frangesh v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frangesh v. Schwartz, 548 So. 2d 299, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2085, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4901, 1989 WL 101272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellants moved to intervene in appel-lees’ dissolution proceeding to establish a lien against the marital home. Fields v. Fields, 35 So.2d 722 (Fla.1948) and Picchi v. Picchi, 100 So.2d 627 (Fla.1958), cited by appellants, do not support the argument that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied their motion to intervene. In Fields, the wife moved to bring in aft additional party in an effort to clear title to a parcel of marital property. In Picchi, the wife sought to join two corporations she claimed were the husband’s alter-ego. Here, neither party sought joinder of appellants. Based on the record before us, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellants' motion to intervene. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL, J., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Picchi v. Picchi
100 So. 2d 627 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Fields v. Fields
35 So. 2d 722 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
548 So. 2d 299, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2085, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4901, 1989 WL 101272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frangesh-v-schwartz-fladistctapp-1989.