Franek v. Brewster

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Franek v. Brewster

76 So. 187, 141 La. 1031, 1915 La. LEXIS 1923

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 23, 1915

DocketNo. 21030

StatusPublished

Cited by23 cases

This text of 76 So. 187 (Franek v. Brewster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franek v. Brewster, 76 So. 187, 141 La. 1031, 1915 La. LEXIS 1923 (La. 1915).

Pincite

Opinions

O’NIELL, J.

[1] The appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal because the clerk of the . civil district court, instead of copying certain documentary evidence into the three copies of the transcript, has sent up the original documents.

On the petition of the appellants, we have issued writs of certiorari, directing the clerk of the civil district court to complete the transcript of appeal in triplicate, by transcribing the original documents into each copy of the record.

It does not appear that the clerk’s error of sending up the original documents and omitting to transcribe them into the triplicate transcripts of appeal is imputable to the appellants or their counsel; and as they have promptly taken the proper steps to correct the error, there is no good cause for dismissing their appeal.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI