Franczyk, L. v. The Home Depot, Pets.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
LINDSAY FRANCZYK, : No. 315 WAL 2021 :
Respondent :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :
: :
THE HOME DEPOT, INC. D/B/A HOME : DEPOT, PHILIP ROGERS, AND THOMAS : MASON, :
:
Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:
(1) Where an employee suffers a workplace injury fairly attributable to a nonemployer third party, is the employee precluded by 77 P.S. § 481’s exclusive remedy provision from bringing a tort claim against the employer for affirmative conduct that impedes the employee’s ability to seek relief against the third-party?
(2) Does the Superior Court’s decision in this case conflict with its decision in Kalik v. Mash, 982 A.2d 85 (Pa. Super. 2009)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Franczyk, L. v. The Home Depot, Pets. (Franczyk, L. v. The Home Depot, Pets.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.