Franczyk, L. v. The Home Depot, Pets.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 16, 2022·No. 315 WAL 2021 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

LINDSAY FRANCZYK, : No. 315 WAL 2021 :

Respondent :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

THE HOME DEPOT, INC. D/B/A HOME : DEPOT, PHILIP ROGERS, AND THOMAS : MASON, :

:

Petitioners :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Where an employee suffers a workplace injury fairly attributable to a nonemployer third party, is the employee precluded by 77 P.S. § 481’s exclusive remedy provision from bringing a tort claim against the employer for affirmative conduct that impedes the employee’s ability to seek relief against the third-party?

(2) Does the Superior Court’s decision in this case conflict with its decision in Kalik v. Mash, 982 A.2d 85 (Pa. Super. 2009)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franczyk, L. v. The Home Depot, Pets., (Pa. 2022).

Franczyk, L. v. The Home Depot, Pets. (Franczyk, L. v. The Home Depot, Pets.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kulik v. Mash
982 A.2d 85 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)