Francoline v. Klatt
603 A.2d 404, 221 Conn. 913, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 77
This text of 603 A.2d 404 (Francoline v. Klatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Francoline v. Klatt, 603 A.2d 404, 221 Conn. 913, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 77 (Colo. 1992).
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 203, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s judgment that the defendant had not proven [914]*914a valid claim under General Statutes §§ 42-110a through 42-110g, the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Housing Authority v. Williams
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2026
State v. Guckian
605 A.2d 874 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
603 A.2d 404, 221 Conn. 913, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francoline-v-klatt-conn-1992.