Francois v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Francois v. State

719 So. 2d 373, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13557, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2357

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 21, 1998

DocketNo. 97-4551

StatusPublished

This text of 719 So. 2d 373 (Francois v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Francois v. State, 719 So. 2d 373, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13557, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2357 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation on the ground of battering a police officer and resisting arrest without violence. Although the trial court recognized at the hearing that he could not revoke on the other alleged violation, because it was based solely on hearsay evidence, the written order indicates revocation on that ground as well. We therefore affirm but remand for the striking of paragraph two of the order revoking probation.

GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation on the ground of battering a police officer and resisting arrest without violence. Although the trial court recognized at the hearing that he could not revoke on the other alleged violation, because it was based solely on hearsay evidence, the written order indicates revocation on that ground as well. We therefore affirm but remand for the striking of paragraph two of the order revoking probation.

GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 So. 2d 373, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13557, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francois-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.