Francois v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Francois v. State

719 So. 2d 373, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13557, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2357

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Francois v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 676 So. 2d 1041 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 1998·No. No. 97-4551·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation on the ground of battering a police officer and resisting arrest without violence. Although the trial court recognized at the hearing that he could not revoke on the other alleged violation, because it was based solely on hearsay evidence, the written order indicates revocation on that ground as well. We therefore affirm but remand for the striking of paragraph two of the order revoking probation.

GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation on the ground of battering a police officer and resisting arrest without violence. Although the trial court recognized at the hearing that he could not revoke on the other alleged violation, because it was based solely on hearsay evidence, the written order indicates revocation on that ground as well. We therefore affirm but remand for the striking of paragraph two of the order revoking probation.

GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Francois v. State, 719 So. 2d 373, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13557, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2357 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

719 So. 2d 373 (Francois v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.