Francois v. Ruiz, No. Cv01 37 95 18 S (Apr. 24, 2002)

Connecticut Superior Court

Francois v. Ruiz, No. Cv01 37 95 18 S (Apr. 24, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5190

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided April 24, 2002·No. No. CV01 37 95 18 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS Under the principles of law discussed in Bolves v. Preston,68 Conn. App. 596, ___ A.2d ___ (2002) (Motion for reconsideration CT Page 5191 pending), this court concludes that it has jurisdiction over defendant Miguel Ruiz as he failed to file his motion to dismiss within thirty days of the time that he appeared in court at the hearing for a prejudgment attachment.

With respect to defendant Luis A. Ruiz, this court finds, based on the affidavit submitted at the hearing, that the writ, summons and amended complaint were not left by the state marshal at the usual place of abode of Luis A. Ruiz. Service was not effectuated and this court therefore does not have jurisdiction over Luis A. Ruiz.

The motion to dismiss is denied as to Miguel Ruiz. The motion to dismiss is granted as to Luis A. Ruiz.

THIM, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS Under the principles of law discussed in Bolves v. Preston,68 Conn. App. 596, ___ A.2d ___ (2002) (Motion for reconsideration CT Page 5191 pending), this court concludes that it has jurisdiction over defendant Miguel Ruiz as he failed to file his motion to dismiss within thirty days of the time that he appeared in court at the hearing for a prejudgment attachment.

With respect to defendant Luis A. Ruiz, this court finds, based on the affidavit submitted at the hearing, that the writ, summons and amended complaint were not left by the state marshal at the usual place of abode of Luis A. Ruiz. Service was not effectuated and this court therefore does not have jurisdiction over Luis A. Ruiz.

The motion to dismiss is denied as to Miguel Ruiz. The motion to dismiss is granted as to Luis A. Ruiz.

THIM, J.

Francois v. Ruiz, No. Cv01 37 95 18 S (Apr. 24, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5190 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5190 (Francois v. Ruiz, No. Cv01 37 95 18 S (Apr. 24, 2002)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related