Franco v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales

103 A.D.3d 543, 962 N.Y.S.2d 54
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 21, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 103 A.D.3d 543 (Franco v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franco v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, 103 A.D.3d 543, 962 N.Y.S.2d 54 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia Rodriguez, J.), entered January 9, 2012, which, in this personal injury action arising from a motor vehicle accident, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The unsigned deposition transcripts submitted by defendants in support of their motion were admissible (see CPLR 3116 [a]). Plaintiffs transcript was certified by the reporter and plaintiff does not challenge its accuracy (Sass v TMT Restoration Consultants Ltd., 100 AD3d 443, 443 [1st Dept 2012]). Although the unsigned deposition transcript of defendant Jordain was not certified by a reporter, it “was submitted by the party deponent himself and, therefore, was adopted as accurate by the deponent” (Rodriguez v Ryder Truck, Inc., 91 AD3d 935, 936 [2d Dept 2012]).

Defendants, as the owner and operator of the stopped vehicle that was rear-ended by plaintiff, were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff failed to provide a non-negligent explanation for the collision (see Francisco v Schoepfer, 30 AD3d 275, 275-276 [1st Dept 2006]). Plaintiff’s assertion that defendants’ vehicle had “stopped suddenly” is insufficient to rebut the presumption of his negligence (id. at 276).

[544]*544We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse, AbdusSalaam and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

322 W. 47th St. HDFC v. Loo
2024 NY Slip Op 34155(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Procopio v. Nargila Grill NYC Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 33403(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Nyambuu v. Whole Foods Mkt. Group, Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 01145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Singh v. New York City Hous. Auth.
2019 NY Slip Op 8272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Arthur v. Liberty Mut. Auto & Home Servs. LLC
2019 NY Slip Op 1316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Tsai Chung Chao v. Chao
2018 NY Slip Op 3620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Safier v. Saggio Restaurant Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 4882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Ying Choy Chong v. 457 West 22nd Street Tenants Corp.
2016 NY Slip Op 7997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Baines v. Daily News L.P.
51 Misc. 3d 229 (New York Supreme Court, 2015)
Castano v. Wygand
122 A.D.3d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Williams v. Hamilton
116 A.D.3d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Foreman v. Skeif
115 A.D.3d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Singh v. Brown
43 Misc. 3d 715 (New York Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.3d 543, 962 N.Y.S.2d 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franco-v-rolling-frito-lay-sales-nyappdiv-2013.