Franco v. 172 E Holdings

110 A.D.3d 636, 974 N.Y.S.2d 241
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 A.D.3d 636 (Franco v. 172 E Holdings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franco v. 172 E Holdings, 110 A.D.3d 636, 974 N.Y.S.2d 241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered February 1, 2013, which granted plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, and set an undertaking in the nominal amount of $100, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm if the relief were not granted, and that the equities weigh in his favor (see Nobu Next Door, LLC v Fine Arts Hous., Inc., 4 NY3d 839 [2005]). The amount of the required undertaking is appropriate (see Pouncy v Dudley, 27 AD3d 633, 635 [2d Dept 2006]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Feinman and Gische, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2013 NY Slip Op 30214(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Soldiers', Sailors', Marines' & Airmen's Club Inc. v. Carlton Regency Corp.
128 A.D.3d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.3d 636, 974 N.Y.S.2d 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franco-v-172-e-holdings-nyappdiv-2013.