Franco, Javier R.

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 29, 2009
DocketWR-72,017-02
StatusPublished

This text of Franco, Javier R. (Franco, Javier R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franco, Javier R., (Tex. 2009).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-72,017-02

JAVIER R. FRANCO, Relator



v.



DALLAS DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent



ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NOS. W06-49271-T(A); W05-45718-T(A); W05-45713-T(A)

IN THE 283rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, that the trial court signed an untimely order designating issues, and that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court. "Without a timely entry of an order designating issues, Article 11.07 imposes a duty upon the clerk of the trial court to immediately transmit to this Court the record from the application for a writ of habeas corpus." Dejean v. District Clerk, Dallas County, 259 S.W.3d 183, 184 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. The respondent, the District Clerk of Dallas County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); stating that the nature of the claims asserted in the application filed by Relator is such that the claims are not cognizable under Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art 11.07, § 3; or stating that Relator has not filed an application for habeas corpus in Dallas County. Should the District Clerk respond with an order designating issues, the response shall contain documentation showing the date that the attorney representing the state was served with the 11.07 application. This motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.



Filed: July 29, 2009

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dejean v. District Clerk, Dallas County
259 S.W.3d 183 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)
McCree v. Hampton
824 S.W.2d 578 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Franco, Javier R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franco-javier-r-texcrimapp-2009.