Franco, Gilbert v. Jaime Rivera and Oscar Sanchaz, d/b/a J&O Construction and Remodeling

2022 TN WC 39
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMay 4, 2022
Docket2021-06-0167
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 TN WC 39 (Franco, Gilbert v. Jaime Rivera and Oscar Sanchaz, d/b/a J&O Construction and Remodeling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franco, Gilbert v. Jaime Rivera and Oscar Sanchaz, d/b/a J&O Construction and Remodeling, 2022 TN WC 39 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2022).

Opinion

FILED May 04, 2022 12:25 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE

GILBERTO FRANCO, ) Docket No. 2021-06-0167 Employee, ) v. ) State File No. 800136-2021 JAIME RIVERA and OSCAR ) SANCHEZ, d/b/a J&O ) Judge Joshua Davis Baker CONSTRUCTION AND ) REMODELING, ) Employer. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held an expedited hearing based on a review of the record without an evidentiary hearing and gave the parties until April 19, 2022, to file position statements and object to the admissibility of documents.

Mr. Franco requested temporary disability and reimbursement of medical expenses for an ankle fracture that occurred while working for J&O Construction and Remodeling, which did not respond.

For the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. Franco is likely to prevail in proving he suffered a work injury and is entitled to medical benefits. However, because he did not present any evidence of loss to support an award, the Court must deny his request at this time.

Claim History

According to Mr. Franco’s petition and declaration, J&O Construction hired him to work as a carpenter for $15 per hour. On February 12, 2021, he fell from a ladder on a jobsite and fractured his ankle. Within a month of his injury, he filed a petition alleging that J&O Construction did not have workers’ compensation insurance and had not provided any benefits. His allegation prompted a Bureau investigator to complete an Expedited Request for Investigation form.

On the form, the investigator reported that Mr. Franco told her J&O Construction employed seven people, and she verified – through an NCCI search – that J&O Construction had no workers’ compensation insurance policy.

On his petition, Mr. Franco reported a Tennessee address and checked a series of boxes explaining his claim. According to those boxes and his brief explanations, he reported his injury to “jaimie & oscar” but did not receive a panel, so he treated on his own with “Dr. Mitchell.” The doctor took him off work from “2/12/21-3/4/21,” which was the date of his injury to the date he filed his petition.

Similarly, in his declaration, Mr. Franco alleged that he had been disabled from working for months because of his ankle fracture. He asked for help from J&O Construction but did not receive any, and he has “collections calling [him] to pay [his] hospital bills.”

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Franco need only present sufficient evidence at this stage that he is likely to prevail at a final hearing. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

First, Mr. Franco must show that he suffered an injury while working for an employer subject to the Workers’ Compensation Law.

An employer uses “the services of not less than five (5) persons for pay[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 50-6-102(13), 50-6-106(5). A work injury is “an injury by accident . . . arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment that causes . . . the need for medical treatment.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14).

Here, Mr. Franco stated in his petition and declaration he fractured his ankle in a fall from a ladder at work. That assertion is unrefuted. And, an ankle fracture certainly requires medical treatment. Mr. Franco asked J&O Construction for treatment but did not receive a panel of physicians, forcing him to obtain his own treatment.

Mr. Franco also provided unrefuted evidence that seven people worked for J&O Construction. Additionally, the investigator performed an NCCI search and found no workers’ compensation insurance. So, the Court finds he worked for an uninsured

2 employer subject to the Workers’ Compensation Law, and he suffered a work injury necessitating treatment.

Even so, Mr. Franco presented no evidence showing an amount owed or spent on treatment, nor any documentary evidence proving his treatment resulted from his “compensable work injury or that the expenses were reasonable and necessary.” Mollica v. EHHI Holdings, Inc., 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *7 (Apr. 21, 2020).

Further, Mr. Franco did not produce any medical evidence other than his own hearsay testimony showing that his injury disabled him from work. See Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). Without this information, Mr. Franco cannot prove a loss, and therefore, the Court cannot discern which benefits he is owed, including whether he needs treatment presently.

In sum, the Court holds that Mr. Franco is unlikely to prevail on his request for temporary disability benefits and reimbursement of medical expenses without additional evidence proving the amount of loss his work injury imposed. However, he is entitled to a panel of physicians.

When an injury requires medical care, an employer is obligated to provide a panel of physicians. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i). The employer must offer the panel “as soon as is practicable but no later than three (3) business days” after being notified of the injury and the request for medical care. Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0800-02-01-.06(1) (2018). Where the employer fails to provide a panel, the employer may be assessed a civil penalty. Id. at 0800-02-01-.06(2).

J&O Construction must give Mr. Franco a panel of physicians. Further, because J&O Construction ignored its legal obligation to provide Mr. Franco a panel of physicians, the Court refers it to the Compliance Unit of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation for appropriate action, if any, based on its failure to provide a panel of physicians as required by the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Lastly, because J&O Construction did not have insurance, Mr. Franco may be eligible to apply for discretionary benefit payments from the Bureau’s Uninsured Employers Fund. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-802(e)(1). However, because Mr. Franco failed to prove any of his losses, the Court reserves ruling on this issue.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court denies Mr. Franco’s request for temporary disability and reimbursement of medical expenses at this time.

3 2. J&O shall provide Mr. Franco a panel of physicians as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i).

3. The Court refers J&O Construction to the Compliance Unit of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation for appropriate action based on its failure to provide a panel of physicians within the deadline under Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-01-.06(1).

4. The Court sets this claim for a status hearing on May 16, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Central Time. The parties must call (615) 741-2113 or toll-free at (855) 874-0474 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

5. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(13)
§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)
§ 50-6-802
Tennessee § 50-6-802(e)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 TN WC 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franco-gilbert-v-jaime-rivera-and-oscar-sanchaz-dba-jo-construction-tennworkcompcl-2022.