Francisco, Royce Glen v. State
This text of Francisco, Royce Glen v. State (Francisco, Royce Glen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion filed May 22, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00568-CR
ROYCE GLEN FRANCISCO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 185th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 919,552
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After a guilty plea, appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated robbery and sentenced to confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for six years on March 13, 2003. No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed until May 2, 2003.
A defendant=s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed May 22, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Francisco, Royce Glen v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francisco-royce-glen-v-state-texapp-2003.