Francisco Rodriguez v. Ovation Services, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 30, 2024
Docket14-24-00165-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Francisco Rodriguez v. Ovation Services, LLC (Francisco Rodriguez v. Ovation Services, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francisco Rodriguez v. Ovation Services, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00165-CV

FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant V. OVATION SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-75436

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a February 9. 2024 “notice of non-suit partial dismissal” filed on February 9, 2024 by appellee Ovation Services LLC, which resulted in a partial dismissal. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

Appellant Francisco Rodriguez filed a notice of appeal on March 04, 2024 specifying that Rodriguez “wants to appeal [the] motion of non-suit partial dismissal filed.” On March 15, 2024, Ovation Services filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

On May 1, 2024, this court sent a notice of involuntary dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a response showing meritorious grounds for continuing the appeal on or before May 15, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Rodriguez’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, we grant Ovation Services’ motion and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Spain and Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson
53 S.W.3d 352 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps
842 S.W.2d 266 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Francisco Rodriguez v. Ovation Services, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francisco-rodriguez-v-ovation-services-llc-texapp-2024.