Francisco P. Garza Jr. A/K/A Frank Perez Garza v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 4, 2011
Docket13-11-00393-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Francisco P. Garza Jr. A/K/A Frank Perez Garza v. State (Francisco P. Garza Jr. A/K/A Frank Perez Garza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francisco P. Garza Jr. A/K/A Frank Perez Garza v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00393-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

FRANCISCO P. GARZA JR. A/K/A FRANK PEREZ GARZA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Franscisco P. Garza Jr. a/k/a Frank Perez Garza, attempts to appeal his

conviction for possession of a controlled substance. The trial court has certified that this

Ais a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.@ See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). On June 23, 2011, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

On July 21, 2011, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel=s response

does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be

dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this

appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 4th day of August, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Francisco P. Garza Jr. A/K/A Frank Perez Garza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francisco-p-garza-jr-aka-frank-perez-garza-v-state-texapp-2011.