Francisco Marizal v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Francisco Marizal v. United States

453 F.2d 1369, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11852

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 13, 1972

Docket71-2829

StatusPublished

This text of 453 F.2d 1369 (Francisco Marizal v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Francisco Marizal v. United States, 453 F.2d 1369, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11852 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1a

1a

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970). Appellant, represented by counsel, was convicted of the unlawful sale of narcotics and the judgment was affirmed on direct appeal, 421 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1970). His chief complaint on the instant appeal is that 4%, months transpired between the time the offense was committed and the date of arrest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1a

1a

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970). Appellant, represented by counsel, was convicted of the unlawful sale of narcotics and the judgment was affirmed on direct appeal, 421 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1970). His chief complaint on the instant appeal is that 4%, months transpired between the time the offense was committed and the date of arrest.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

453 F.2d 1369, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francisco-marizal-v-united-states-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack