Francisco Llanas v. the State of Texas
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
NO. 03-22-00745-CR
Francisco Llanas, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-DC-20-300570, THE HONORABLE BRAD URRUTIA, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
We previously dismissed this appeal for want of jurisdiction after concluding that
appellant Francisco Llanas had no right to appeal. Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing and
a motion for en banc reconsideration asserting that the trial court’s certification of his right of
appeal is incorrect.
Courts of appeals have the ability to examine a trial court’s certification of a
defendant’s right of appeal for defectiveness and to obtain a new certification under Texas Rules
of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c) and 37.1, whenever appropriate. Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610,
614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c), 37.1. Accordingly, we withdraw our opinion, dissenting opinion, and judgment dated
October 3, 2024; reinstate this appeal; and abate and remand the cause to the trial court for entry
of an amended certification that accurately reflects appellant’s right of appeal. The trial court
shall include the amended certification in a supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with this
Court no later than December 27, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). Appellant’s motion for
rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration are dismissed as moot.
It is so ordered on December 13, 2024.
Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Smith
Abated and Remanded
Filed: December 13, 2024
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Francisco Llanas v. the State of Texas (Francisco Llanas v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.