Francisco Javier Medrano v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 1, 2006
Docket13-06-00246-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Francisco Javier Medrano v. State (Francisco Javier Medrano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francisco Javier Medrano v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

               NUMBERS 13-06-246-CR and 13-06-247-CR

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____________________________________________________________  _____

FRANCISCO JAVIER MEDRANO,                                 Appellant,

                                           v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                              Appellee.

_______________________________________________________  ___________

                On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

                          of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________ _____________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

             Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez, and Castillo

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, FRANCISCO JAVIER MEDRANO, attempted to perfect appeals from  judgments entered by County Court at Law No. 2 of Cameron County, Texas.  Sentence in these cause was imposed on August 11, 2005.  No timely motions for new trial were filed.   The notices of appeal were due to be filed on September 12, 2005, but were not filed until May 10, 2006.   Said notices of appeal are untimely filed.

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within  fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension.  Appellant failed to file his notices of appeal and a motion requesting an extension of time within such period.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeals, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 1st day of June, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Francisco Javier Medrano v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francisco-javier-medrano-v-state-texapp-2006.