Francisco James Hurtado v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 25, 2014·No. 05-14-00717-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered December 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00717-CR

FRANCISCO JAMES HURTADO, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-81421-2012

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On October 31, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and Stephanie Hudson has been appointed to represent him; (3) Ms. Hudson’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is her workload; and (4) Ms. Hudson needs thirty days from the December 19, 2014 findings to file appellant’s brief.

We note that appellant’s brief is already three months overdue, Ms. Hudson at no time filed a motion to extend time to file the brief, and the appeal has been abated for nearly sixty days awaiting the findings. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his brief by JANUARY 20, 2015. No further extensions will be granted. If appellant’s brief is not filed within the time specified, the Court will utilize the available remedies to obtain the brief, which may include ordering that Stephanie Hudson be removed as appellate counsel and that the trial court appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this case.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Ray Wheless, Presiding Judge, 366th Judicial District Court; Stephanie Hudson; and John Rolater.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Francisco James Hurtado v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Francisco James Hurtado v. State (Francisco James Hurtado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.