Francisco Calleja-Ahedo v. Compass Bank
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-15-00210-CV Style: Francisco Calleja-Ahedo v. Compass Bank Date motion filed*: May 5, 2015 Type of motions: Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief Parties filing motions: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time:
Original due date: N/A Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: N/A Date Requested: N/A (45 days from May 14, 2015)
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due:
Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Because the reporter’s record was not timely filed, on April 14, 2015, this Court ordered the reporter to file the record, if any, by May 14, 2015. Accordingly, the motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is denied as premature without prejudice to refiling because, though the clerk’s record was filed on April 9, 2015, the briefing deadline does not begin until after the reporter’s record has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(2).
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
Date: May 12, 2015
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Francisco Calleja-Ahedo v. Compass Bank (Francisco Calleja-Ahedo v. Compass Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.