Francisco Arzate v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 16, 2013·No. 01-12-01074-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-12-01074-CR Style: Francisco Arzate v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: 9/11/2013 Appellant’s Pro-Se Supplemental Motion for New Appellate Counsel on Appeal, to Type of motion: Dismiss Present Appellant’s Brief and to File a New Appellant’s Brief Party filing motion: Francisco Azarte Document to be filed:

If motion to extend time: Deadline to file document: Number of previous extensions granted: Length of extension sought:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:

 The Clerk is instructed to file the document as of the date of this order  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

X Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Rebeca Huddle  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ______________________________.

Date: September 16, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Francisco Arzate v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Francisco Arzate v. State (Francisco Arzate v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.