Francisco A. Salinas Hernandez v. Maria Nambo and Hector Nambo
This text of Francisco A. Salinas Hernandez v. Maria Nambo and Hector Nambo (Francisco A. Salinas Hernandez v. Maria Nambo and Hector Nambo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-25-00342-CV __________________
FRANCISCO A. SALINAS HERNANDEZ, Appellant
V.
MARIA NAMBO AND HECTOR NAMBO, Appellees
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 22-09-12852 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 11, 2025, Appellant Francisco A. Salinas Hernandez filed a
notice of appeal from a post-judgment enforcement order signed on August 28, 2025,
from the 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas. Upon receiving the
notice of appeal from Appellant, the Clerk of the Court issued an Invoice for the
filing fee for the appeal. By letter dated October 27, 2025, we notified the parties
that Appellant had not paid the filing fee as directed in our previous letter. A
Certified Bill of Costs for the filing fee was enclosed and provided to Appellant.
1 We warned Appellant in our letter, dated October 27, 2025, that unless the
filing fee was paid, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice on any date
after Wednesday, November 12, 2025. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). As of this date,
Appellant has failed to pay the filing fee as directed by this Court.
Appellant has not paid the filing fee for the appeal. Appellant did not file a
statement of inability to pay costs in this matter and has not shown that he is entitled
to proceed without payment of costs. See id. 20.1. Furthermore, Appellants failed to
comply with a notice from the Clerk of the Court requiring a response within a
specified time. See id. 42.3(c). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See
id. 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on January 7, 2026 Opinion Delivered January 8, 2026
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Francisco A. Salinas Hernandez v. Maria Nambo and Hector Nambo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francisco-a-salinas-hernandez-v-maria-nambo-and-hector-nambo-txctapp9-2026.