FRANCISCA R. ROZAS CRISTINO v. JERMAINE ANDERSON

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 2023
Docket22-0844
StatusPublished

This text of FRANCISCA R. ROZAS CRISTINO v. JERMAINE ANDERSON (FRANCISCA R. ROZAS CRISTINO v. JERMAINE ANDERSON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FRANCISCA R. ROZAS CRISTINO v. JERMAINE ANDERSON, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 4, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-844 Lower Tribunal No. 18-41136 ________________

Francisca R. Rozas Cristino, Appellant,

vs.

Jermaine Anderson, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark Blumstein, Judge.

Law Offices of Lazaro Lopez, and Lazaro Lopez, for appellant.

The Brown Law Group, LLC, and Vincent T. Brown, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d 925,

928 (Fla. 2005) (“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal

argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that

presentation if it is to be considered preserved.” (quoting Tillman v.

State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tillman v. State
471 So. 2d 32 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins
914 So. 2d 925 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
FRANCISCA R. ROZAS CRISTINO v. JERMAINE ANDERSON, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francisca-r-rozas-cristino-v-jermaine-anderson-fladistctapp-2023.