Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Geiger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Geiger

236 A.D.2d 878, 653 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D.2d 878 (Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Geiger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Geiger, 236 A.D.2d 878, 653 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the [879]*879amended complaint. The amended complaint alleges the necessary elements of a cause of action under article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (see, Prometheus Books v Russica Book & Art Shop, 105 AD2d 1138, 1140; Loblaw, Inc. v Wylie, 50 AD2d 4, 7) and alleges fraud in sufficient detail to satisfy the requirement of CPLR 3016 (b) (see, Moore Adv. Agency v Shapiro, 124 AD2d 696). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J.—Amend Complaint.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the [879]*879amended complaint. The amended complaint alleges the necessary elements of a cause of action under article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (see, Prometheus Books v Russica Book & Art Shop, 105 AD2d 1138, 1140; Loblaw, Inc. v Wylie, 50 AD2d 4, 7) and alleges fraud in sufficient detail to satisfy the requirement of CPLR 3016 (b) (see, Moore Adv. Agency v Shapiro, 124 AD2d 696). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J.—Amend Complaint.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D.2d 878, 653 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-w-king-petroleum-products-inc-v-geiger-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack