Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Geiger

236 A.D.2d 878, 653 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1851

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the [879] amended complaint. The amended complaint alleges the necessary elements of a cause of action under article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (see, Prometheus Books v Russica Book & Art Shop, 105 AD2d 1138, 1140; Loblaw, Inc. v Wylie, 50 AD2d 4, 7) and alleges fraud in sufficient detail to satisfy the requirement of CPLR 3016 (b) (see, Moore Adv. Agency v Shapiro, 124 AD2d 696). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J.—Amend Complaint.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Geiger, 236 A.D.2d 878, 653 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

236 A.D.2d 878 (Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Geiger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loblaw, Inc. v. Wylie
50 A.D.2d 4 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Prometheus Books v. Russica Book & Art Shop, Inc.
105 A.D.2d 1138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Ed Moore Advertising Agency, Inc. v. Shapiro
124 A.D.2d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)