Francis v. Taft Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.

281 A.D. 893, 119 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3703
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1953·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for false arrest, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff's case, and from an order denying his motion to set aside the decision dismissing the complaint and for a new trial. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. In our opinion, there was a complete failure of proof that defendants, or any of them, instigated or directed plaintiff’s arrest, or did more than merely to furnish information to the police officers when called upon to state facts for their guidance. (Cf. Vernes v. Phillips, 266 N. Y. 298; Grinnell v. Weston, 95 App. Div. 454; Davern v. Drew, 153 App. Div. 844, affd. sub nom. Davern v. Breen, 214 N. Y. 681.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ. [See post, p. 983.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Francis v. Taft Cleaners & Dyers, Inc., 281 A.D. 893, 119 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

281 A.D. 893 (Francis v. Taft Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vennard v. Sunnyside Savings & Loan Ass'n
44 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Jacques v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
37 A.D.2d 121 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
Barnes v. Bollhorst
14 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Stearns v. New York City Transit Authority
24 Misc. 2d 216 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)