Francis v. Steadman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Francis v. Steadman

176 A.D. 892

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 176 A.D. 892 (Francis v. Steadman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Francis v. Steadman, 176 A.D. 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that under the evidence and the law, as declared in the charge and properly so, the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict for $113, if any, and that, therefore, the verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $50 must have been the result of an illogical and improper compromise on the part of the jury. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that under the evidence and the law, as declared in the charge and properly so, the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict for $113, if any, and that, therefore, the verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $50 must have been the result of an illogical and improper compromise on the part of the jury. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 A.D. 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-steadman-nyappdiv-1916.