Francis v. State

805 S.W.2d 474, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 53, 1991 WL 32402
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 13, 1991·No. No. 099-91·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted appellant of murder and assessed punishment at confinement for life plus a fine of $10,000. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Francis v. State, 801 S.W.2d 548, (Tex.App.—Houston [14th], 1990).

Appellant raises four grounds for review. After careful review we refuse appellant’s petition for review. However, as is true in every case in which discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 [475]*475(Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Francis v. State, 805 S.W.2d 474, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 53, 1991 WL 32402 (Tex. 1991).

805 S.W.2d 474 (Francis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheffield v. State
650 S.W.2d 813 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Francis v. State
801 S.W.2d 548 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)