Francis v. State
This text of 805 S.W.2d 474 (Francis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
A jury convicted appellant of murder and assessed punishment at confinement for life plus a fine of $10,000. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Francis v. State, 801 S.W.2d 548, (Tex.App.—Houston [14th], 1990).
Appellant raises four grounds for review. After careful review we refuse appellant’s petition for review. However, as is true in every case in which discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 [475]*475(Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
805 S.W.2d 474, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 53, 1991 WL 32402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-state-texcrimapp-1991.