Francis v. State
39 So. 897, 87 Miss. 493
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In view of the rule that, to sustain a charge of grand larceny, the evidence must show, beyond reasonable doubt, that the property was of the value necessary to constitute that offense, this case must be reversed and a- new trial awarded. So ordered.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Francis v. State, 39 So. 897, 87 Miss. 493 (Mich. 1905).
39 So. 897 (Francis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Boswell
148 S.E. 1 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1929)
Carnley v. State
89 So. 808 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)