Francis v. State
39 So. 897, 87 Miss. 493
This text of 39 So. 897 (Francis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Francis v. State, 39 So. 897, 87 Miss. 493 (Mich. 1905).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In view of the rule that, to sustain a charge of grand larceny, the evidence must show, beyond reasonable doubt, that the property was of the value necessary to constitute that offense, this case must be reversed and a- new trial awarded. So ordered.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Boswell
148 S.E. 1 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1929)
Carnley v. State
89 So. 808 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 So. 897, 87 Miss. 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-state-miss-1905.