Francis v. State
765 So. 2d 228, 2000 WL 1021993
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Francis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 736 So. 2d 97 →
Opinion
The order denying the defendant’s motion for the return of personal property seized when he was arrested was properly denied as untimely filed almost two years after his case was closed by his plea and sentence — well beyond the sixty day jurisdictional period provided by section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes (1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Francis v. State, 765 So. 2d 228, 2000 WL 1021993 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
765 So. 2d 228 (Francis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.