Francis v. Slack
9 F. Cas. 689, 4 Cliff. 186
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedMay 15, 1872
DocketCase No. 5,041
StatusPublished
This text of 9 F. Cas. 689 (Francis v. Slack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Francis v. Slack, 9 F. Cas. 689, 4 Cliff. 186 (circtdma 1872).
Opinion
The court direct that judgment be entered for the defendant, upon the ground that the claim of the plaintiff is barred by the act of congress on that behalf, as construed by the supreme court in the case of Nichols v. U. S. [7 Wall. (74 U. S.) 122]; and Collector v. Hubbard, 12 Wall. [79 U. S.] 14; Brown v. Sauerwein, 10 Wall. [77 U. S.] 218.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 F. Cas. 689, 4 Cliff. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-slack-circtdma-1872.