Francis v. Rose

141 Ky. 645
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJuly 1, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 141 Ky. 645 (Francis v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francis v. Rose, 141 Ky. 645 (Ky. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Judge O’Rear

Reversing.

Appellant while a married woman executed a convey-, anee in 1889 to appellee of her interest in a tract of land in Jackson county for a consideration recited as paid. The deed, though joined in by her husband, was not acknowledged or recorded. The deed was void. (Sec. 507, Ky. Stats.; Sec. 2129, Ky. Stats.; Kennedy v. Ten Broeck, 11 Bush, 241; Lou., et al. Ry. Co. v. Stephens, 96 Ky., 401; Swafford v. Herd, 23 Rep., 1556; Wright v. Begley, 31 Rep., 53.)

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dwiggins v. Howard
57 S.W.2d 649 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)
Burk v. Moore
272 S.W. 38 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 Ky. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-rose-kyctapp-1911.