Francis v. Parks

55 Vt. 80
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJanuary 15, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 55 Vt. 80 (Francis v. Parks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francis v. Parks, 55 Vt. 80 (Vt. 1883).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rowell, J.

The only ground of relief alleged in the bill is, that the orator was misled and misinformed as to the time when the last installment became due under the judgment, but it is hot alleged how nor by whom he was thus misled and misinformed. The answer denies the equity of the bill. The orator must stand on the case made by the bill, and cannot rely for relief on any matter not therein stated, though shown by the master’s report. The master has not found that the orator was either misled or misinformed in the premises. He says that he- may have understood in some'way that the last installment was due on May 1st instead of April 1st, but if he did, it was the result of carelessness. Such a finding affords no ground for equitable relief.

Decree affirmed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aldrich v. LINCOLN LAND CORPORATION
294 A.2d 853 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1972)
Ward v. Lyman
188 A. 892 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1937)
New York Life Insurance v. Kimball
106 A. 676 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1919)
Hill v. Ritchie
98 A. 497 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1916)
Crompton v. Beedle
75 A. 331 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 Vt. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-parks-vt-1883.