Francis v. Latella
This text of 248 A.D.2d 535 (Francis v. Latella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent John Latella, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to determine the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPL 30.30 (2) (b) in a criminal proceeding entitled People v Arthur Francis.
Motion by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.
Motion by the respondent John Latella to dismiss the proceeding.
[536]*536Ordered that the motions are granted; and it is further,
Ordered that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner’s motion was decided by the Supreme Court, Queens County, on January 12, 1998.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D.2d 535, 669 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-latella-nyappdiv-1998.