Francis v. Jordan

4 Ky. 536, 1 Bibb 536, 1809 Ky. LEXIS 137
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 28, 1809
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ky. 536 (Francis v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francis v. Jordan, 4 Ky. 536, 1 Bibb 536, 1809 Ky. LEXIS 137 (Ky. Ct. App. 1809).

Opinion

OPINION of the Court* by

Ch. J. Bibb

In an action of debt, the defendants in error had judgment by default upon a declaration, blank from beginning to end ; being in fact nothing more than a mere skeleton of a declaration, such as are usually printed to suit any action of debt.

The judgment rendered is therefore without any foundation and must be holden for nought.

It is therefore considered that the said judgment be reversed, and the cause is remanded to the said circuit court for new proceedings to be had, to commence at the return of the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Ky. 536, 1 Bibb 536, 1809 Ky. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-jordan-kyctapp-1809.