Francis v. Hartford Fire Insurance

101 Ohio St. 3d 62
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 14, 2004
DocketNo. 2003-1697
StatusPublished

This text of 101 Ohio St. 3d 62 (Francis v. Hartford Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francis v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 101 Ohio St. 3d 62 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westfield Insurance v. Galatis
797 N.E.2d 1256 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 Ohio St. 3d 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-v-hartford-fire-insurance-ohio-2004.